Category talk:Anglo-Norman Old French

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

As much as I hate doing this, I'm RFD'ing my own creation. I think all of these should be under Category:Anglo-Norman parts of speech. Anglo-Norman has it's own ISO code, and I think we should respect that. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

That seems sensible, but you know more of the ins and outs of this than all or almost all of us. I'm sure that all those interesting in English etymology appreciate your efforts in the field of the Middle and Old French, Anglo-Norman, and Old North French. BTW, have you determined to treat ONF by default as Old French? Inferring from WP it seems to be ancestral to modern Norman (which has its own code) and to Anglo-Norman. DCDuring TALK 16:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Agree, these should really be kept separate. Ƿidsiþ 16:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I know that SIL merged Provençal into Occitan, if they could do the same with xno and fro, I'd be a happier man. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

They are very similar, it's hard to tell the difference between xno and fro. I feel a bit blind sometimes. Template:Anglo-Norman will also become obsolete if this is deleted, and will be deleted as well. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted, but see Category:Anglo-Norman language. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)