Category talk:English transitive verbs

Latest comment: 7 years ago by -sche in topic RFM discussion: October 2015–June 2016

is there any way that we can make this a comprehensive list? preferably without manually entering them all?

RFM discussion: October 2015–June 2016 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


And the same for "intransitive" and for all other languages. Pretty much for the same reason as the "countable" proposal above. —CodeCat 20:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. I don't see a problem saying that a verb is both a transitive verb and an intransitive verb, so there is no need to use this kind of circumlocutory language. However, the disproportionality problem is harder to solve here than for countability of nouns. Nevertheless, I don't think renaming the category is relevant to the disproportionality problem. --WikiTiki89 21:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Not moved. - -sche (discuss) 00:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Return to "English transitive verbs" page.