Citations:paedophilia

English citations of paedophilia and paedophiliae

Noun: British standard spelling of pedophilia edit

1901 2010
ME « 15th c. 16th c. 17th c. 18th c. 19th c. 20th c. 21st c.
  • 1901, an Oxford M.A. (pseud. of unknown), The plague of lust: being a history of venereal disease in classical antiquity [] , from the 6th unabridged German edition, Paris: C. Carrington, translation of Geschichte der Lustseuche im Alterthume: nebst ausführlichen Untersuchungen über den Venus- und Phalluskultus, Bordelle, Nousos thelēia der Skythen, Paederastie und andere geschlechtliche Ausschweifungen der Alten, [] by Julius Rosenbaum, →OCLC, pages 117–119:
    Just as was the case with the cult of Venus in that country, so the "love of boys" assumed quite a different form in Greece. As Paedophilia (Affection for boys) it took rank as one of the means of education, being consecrate to the heavenly Eros, while Paederastia (Carnal love of boys) fell to the province of the common Eros. Down to quite modern times Paedophilia has been confounded with Paederastia, [] the two things approached very near each other; still Paederastia was never approved by the Greeks1. At Sparta the violation of boys was punished by loss of civil rights, exile or death 1, and it was the same at Athens, [] The fact that the laws relating to this offence were promulgated at Athens only after the time of Solon shows that paederastia, as well as brothels, did not come into use there till about that time. []
  • 1981, Contemporary developments in the definition and punishment of sex offences: Proceeding of the international colloquium organized and hosted by the Swedish National Section, International Association of Penal Law, held in Stockholm, May 31 to June 3, 1978, →ISBN (10), →ISBN (13), 54:
    With respect to quite a number of events which can be defined as paedophiliae a secular perspective on the state, subscribing to a pluriform society, seems to have to lead to the conclusion that there is no competence of the state to interfere with these forms of sexual interactions.
  • 2010, Thore Langfeldt, “Is 'pedophilia' a useful or a confusing concept? An empirical study on sexual abuse of children, sexual orientation and typology: implications for therapy”, in Sexual Offender Treatment[1], volume 5, number 1, Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers, →ISSN, archived from the original on 2013-04-24:
    From a historical point of view, pedophilia is one phenomenon. [] Richard von Krafft-Ebing, who in his first book, Psychopathia Sexualis, in 1886 used the term "paedophilia erotica". He defined it as a sexual interest toward children, either prepubescent or at the beginning of puberty. In his definition, the sexual interest was the primary one, that was, exclusively or mainly toward children, and remaining over time. With Krafft-Ebing, concepts like "hereditary taint" and "moral degeneracy," were brought into the medical vocabulary to explain sexually deviant behavior in general.

Noun: "a World Health Organization clinical diagnostic classification of some pedophilia" edit

2002 2007 2013
ME « 15th c. 16th c. 17th c. 18th c. 19th c. 20th c. 21st c.
  • 2002 November, Marie Keenan, “Child sexual abuse: the heart of the matter”, in The Furrow, volume 53, number 11, Maynooth, IE: The Furrow, →ISSN, →JSTOR, page 600:
    Medicalized discourses are rooted in two principle systems of 'classification' of all diseases [] Unchanged for nearly fifty years the current ICD version (ICD-10, WHO, 1988) defines paedophilia as 'a sexual preference for children, largely of pre pubertal or early pre-pubertal age'. The diagnostic criterion
  • 2007, Kris Naudts, Pamela Jane Taylor, Ayana Gibbs, Farah Khalid, Frederique Van den Eynde, Cornells Van Heeringen, “Paedophilia and brain scanning: a fruitful approach?”, in Raymond C. Browne, editor, Forensic psychiatry research trends, New York: Nova Science Publishers, →ISBN, page 118:
    Paedophilia is defined as a mental disorder within the International Classification of Diseases ICD-10 [] Contrary to any medical model of a diagnosis, however,such classification offers no understanding of aetiology and no indication of prognosis or grounds for treatment.
  • 2013, Michael Davis, “Differentiating child sexual abusers”, in InPsych[2], Carlton South, Vic.: Australian Psychological Society, →ISSN:
    [] formal DSM-5 and ICD-10 criteria are not particularly useful for this task. Indeed, the DSM-5 criteria for ‘pedophilic disorder’ (APA, 2013) and the ICD-10 criteria for ‘paedophilia’ (WHO, 1992) seemingly depend upon the offender honestly describing their sexual fantasies at interview. But this cannot simply be assumed in forensic assessment.

Latin citations of paedophiliam and paedophilia

  • 2007, Periodica de re canonica: Indices tertiae seriei (1982–2005), Rome: Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana, ISSN: 0031‒529X, § 5: “Index analiticus rerum”, 101:
    Homosexualitas: 82/307; 82/310; 82/312; 86/110; 91/3; h. absoluta 91/3; 91/25; h. activa 91/14; h. et matrimonium catholicum 83/289; h. et optio pro sacerdotio 83/278; h. et patrimonium geneticum 91/24; h. et personae identificatio 83/276; h. et promissio caelibatus 83/283; h. feminea 83/278; h. feminea et h. masculina 91/19; h. in magisterio Ecclesiae 91/4; h. masculina 83/278; h. passiva 91/14; h. relativa 91/3; h. ut pathologia neurotransmissionis 91/10; h. ut perturbatio maturationis sexualis 91/13; 91/23; aditus medici ad h. 91/7; causae h. 91/20; familia h. 91/15; formae h. 91/15; matrimonio inter personas h. 91/15; relatio h. inter et paedophiliam 91/52; therapia medica perturbationis h. 91/26.
  • ibidem, 154:
    Paedophilia et efebophilia: p. et e. ut abusus sexualis 91/51; clerici ut auctores criminis p. et e. 91/56; cura pastoralis erga clericos paedophilos aut efebophilos 91/59; diagnosis et cura medici p. et e. 91/55; interventus Ecclesiae in crimen clerici paedophili aut efebophili 91/58; psychogenesis et psychodynamismus perturbationis p. et e. 91/53.