Citations:vaccinationist

English citations of vaccinationist

					1882 1898	1908 1934	2005 2013
ME «	15th c.	16th c.	17th c.	18th c.	19th c.	20th c.	21st c.

1882, The Nineteenth Century, volume 11, page 534:
I cannot see how this fact can be explained on any other principle than that of the ‘protective’ influence of the vaccination on the children which had received it; whilst, on the other hand, the gradual decline of that protection (now admitted by all vaccinationists) left a large proportion of the vaccinated open to be attacked in later life, unless protected by re-vaccination.

1882 February, Henry Bergh, “The Lancet and the Law”, in The North American Review, volume 134, number 303, page 166:
What, then, must they think of the law which requires that a like foul virus shall be perforce injected into their own veins, to befoul the whole current of their blood and to introduce all manner of diseases? “But care is taken to have the lymph fresh and pure from the heifer,” say the vaccinationists.

1898 July 19, Mr. T. P. O'Connor (Liverpool, Scotland), “Commons Chamber: Clergy Mutual Assurance Society Bill Hl: Orders Of The Day: Vaccination Bill”, in House of Commons Hansard (House of Commons), volume 62, column 363:
Now, Mr. Speaker, I do not think, although I am a strong vaccinationist, that anybody in this House can deny that there is a considerable number of honest, earnest, and convinced opponents of vaccination in the country. […] You put the burden of proof practically on vaccinationists instead of putting the burden on those who oppose vaccination.

1908 January, “Editorial: Compulsory Health”, in The Medical Advance, volume 46, number 1, page 57:
There is a great difference of opinion here not only among laymen but also among medical experts and it is manifestly an unsound principle for any one of the various sets of vaccinationists to try to force their mode upon others.

1934 September 12, “Debate Value of Vaccine”, in Science News Letter, volume 26, page 133:
Eradicationists and vaccinationists lined up and discharged scientific broadsides in the briskest exchange of conflicting views that enlivened the session.

2005, Kurt Link, “Smallpox Vaccine”, in The Vaccine Controversy: The History, Use, and Safety of Vaccinations, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, →ISBN, page 43:
Jenner termed this procedure "vaccination" after the Latin word for cow. The vaccination had succeeded. Jenner made no secret of this initial success, and, although there were many skeptics, other practitioners joined the ranks of vaccinationists.

2013, John Rhodes, “The Teeming Humanity of Nations”, in The End of Plagues: The Global Battle Against Infectious Disease, New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, →ISBN, page 59:
That smallpox could ravage London in the mid-nineteenth century, despite the existence of a new medical measure to prevent it, was a source of great frustration to the vaccinationists. In 1840 the epidemiologist William Farr railed against the fact that five children a day were dying of smallpox in London.