Talk:古闆

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Wyang in topic RFD discussion: April–June 2016

I don't think this traditional form is correct. As far as I know, 闆 is only used for 老闆, though I may be wrong. For 古板, Wenlin doesn't list 古闆 as a traditional form. ---> Tooironic 00:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it's correct either. It should be deleted. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 18:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

RFD discussion: April–June 2016 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Incorrect simplified to traditional conversion of 古板 (gǔbǎn). is only used in 老闆. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 18:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Delete. Wyang (talk) 23:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deleted. Wyang (talk) 11:50, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Return to "古闆" page.