Talk:-ess

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Backinstadiums in topic -esses: reduplicated plural

Usage notes edit

I've undone the reversion of my edit of 17 Jan, on the basis that my edit was made in good faith and no reasoning is given for the reversion. If there is a genuine difference of opinion on what the second usage note should say then I'm happy to discuss. 62.30.205.46 18:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Can u Give examples of those nouns formed from verbs by the suffix -ess. AsaP

-or as a "feminizing" suffix? edit

The suffix "-or" is listed under "Synonyms" as being a "female suffix", just like "-ess". Is this a mistake? The others are pretty obvious (e.g., -a, -ette, -euse, -rix, she-), but I can't come up with an example for -or. Can someone else? - dcljr 01:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think the contributor's idea is that now, because a female can be called an actor, -or is a feminine suffix. Obviously it is now both a masculine and a gender-neutral one. DCDuring TALK 02:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

what edit

"Not to be confused with -ness, especially in words like lioness, baroness, etc."

you literally listed LIONESS as an example of -ess suffix which it is

and when you click the "-ness" you're not supposed to confuse "-ess" with, you get to -ness suffix in darkness, calmness etc.

what

It's saying not confuse words that end in -n that are given the suffix -ess to have the suffix -ness. E.g. it's lion + -ess, not lio + -ness. Baron + -ess, not baro + -ness.

-esses: reduplicated plural edit

In the Sussex dialect, however, until relatively recently there existed a reduplicated plural: e.g. one ghost, two ghostes/ghostesses; one post, two postes/postesses (note that here the Sussex pluralisation instead of adding just 's' after 'st', adds either 'es' as its usual plural, or a reduplicated 'esses'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduplicated_plural

--Backinstadiums (talk) 12:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Return to "-ess" page.