Talk:Latter Day Saint

Latest comment: 13 years ago by V-ball in topic RFV discussion

RFV discussion edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


I don't think this is used other than attributively. It does not seem a true adjective. DCDuring TALK 22:51, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

RFV failed, POS section removed. I agree. —RuakhTALK 15:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
What does "used attributively" mean?  The example of how this is used as an adjective that comes to mind is this: Latter-day Saint literature is considered to be of poor quality by both Mormons and non-Mormons alike.  Is that attributively? — V-ball 22:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, exactly. One major use of adjectives is as attributive modifiers of nouns, but most nouns can also be used attributively. "My laptop bag" does not mean *"my bag that is laptop", nor *"my bag, which is laptop"; rather, it means "my bag for my laptop". In this example, "laptop" is just a noun. If we know that a word is sometimes a countable common noun, then to see if it's also an adjective, we have to look for sentences where it's used in ways that adjectives are used and countable common nouns aren't; for example, if I say, "He's carrying a very laptop bag", or "His bag is laptop", then I'm clearly not using "laptop" as a countable common noun. —RuakhTALK 22:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. — V-ball 02:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


Return to "Latter Day Saint" page.