Talk:Plasmodium
Validity of material for Plasmodium edit
@陳弈豪 The fact that the material is valid for Wikipedia does not mean that it is invalid for the dictionary. For example, the capitalisation or otherwise of plasmodium/Plasmodium is a matter of usage, and as such is fully valid for a dictionary entry. The material in the caption for the illustrations is necessary for anyone who is not familiar with the subject matter, which includes most biologists, as well as laymen. We are not all Culicologists. Accordingly, if you think that it should be re-organised into separate entries, and that is disputed, then you have to justify your diagnosis. Acting boldly is one thing. Trying to bully your personal preferences into acceptance is another. In case you are not willing to discuss this matter here, I am posting a link to tea room. And am reverting the text to the original pending a decision from the arbitrators JonRichfield (talk) 18:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)