Talk:ac
Request for verification edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: conjuction. Was this in use in English post 1500? If the OED says it was, that would be fine, because it is a pain to cite. DCDuring TALK 20:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- The OED's only cite after 1400 is this one from 1535, which I'm guessing we'd consider Middle Scots rather than Early Modern English. —RuakhTALK 02:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, ==English== section converted to ==Middle English==. —RuakhTALK 18:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
This has one quotation, but the quotation is not actually in English, so it doesn't attest this term for English. It also failed RFV before. —CodeCat 19:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- It even uses the same quote that Ruakh said in the course of the rvf was probably Middle Scots. I'm sure it's a case of forgetting that what the OED considers Scottish dialects, we consider the Scots language. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- Middle Scots doesn't have a code. Should we make one for it? Category:Middle Scots is a subcat of Category:Regional Scots, which seems wrong. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- Probably. - -sche (discuss) 21:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Middle Scots doesn't have a code. Should we make one for it? Category:Middle Scots is a subcat of Category:Regional Scots, which seems wrong. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- RFV failed. Removed by User:-sche in diff. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 02:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)