Last modified on 22 May 2015, at 04:47

Talk:am

Math tagEdit

Does anyone the purpose of the section starting with the <math> tag at the end of this article? -- Nick1nildram 16:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Green check.svg

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.


amEdit

Romanian section was RFD'd some time ago, but not listed here - the RFD reason was "rework entirely or remove" --Jackofclubs 07:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Strong keep, absolutely no reason for deletion. But yes, clean-up is definitely in order. —RuakhTALK 17:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Why should it be deleted? It lists the form of verb avea. --Lexyv
Keep. How lazy lol... "I don't want to rework it, so I want to delete it". — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 14:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
^ in other words, this should be at WT:RFC if anything — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 14:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Kept, should never have been there. WT:RFC#am is where it should have been. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


TK archive icon.svg

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.


am#RomanianEdit

am#Romanian, was at first nominated for deletion but blatantly exists. I'd think some templates would fix this quite quickly. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Apparently, you've already fixed it. Stephen has removed RFC tag --Volants 14:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)


SuraEdit

Which Sura?

Sura language may refer to:

  • Mwaghavul language (Nigeria)
  • Surjapuri language (India)
  • Tatuyo language (Colombia)

LinguistManiac (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

It's the first one, which (if you were aware of the existence of all the languages you mentioned above) should've been obvious given the nature of the references. Or you could've clicked 'Edit' to see that its ISO code is sur. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Then why not call it Mwaghavul right away? This kind of ambiguity is bad and if you require to look at the source for disambiguation ... funny. LinguistManiac (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Return to "am" page.