Talk:an apple a day
Last modified on 21 January 2011, at 18:45
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so. See Wiktionary’s criteria for inclusion.
Is this seen in the short form like this? Can someone provide some quotations, please? — Paul G 09:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Certainly. But isn't the point of phrases not being RFV'd because they are typically modified to their root forms, applicable here? --Connel MacKenzie T C 06:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)