Last modified on 21 November 2008, at 20:49

Talk:ballocks

Return to "ballocks" page.

"From: WT:RFC"Edit

would this not be better just as a spelling variation on bollocks, and then just redirected tobollocks, which has a fuller definition.--Richardb 16:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

We don't use "#redirect [[]]" for spelling variations though. A short entry referencing bollocks from ballocks seems appropriate to me. --Connel MacKenzie T C 22:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
At the moment there are duplicate articles,though no doubt with differrences. Which is what I'd prefer to see us avoid. I was not suggesting a simple #redirect, but a brief entry saying something like "Spelling variant (archaic) of bollocks"

"I'm a ballocks"Edit

The Joyce citation ("I'm a ballocks") seems go against the idea of this being a plurale tantum, since there is no measure word. Equinox 20:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)