Talk:busy

Latest comment: 4 months ago by ExcarnateSojourner in topic RFM discussion: July 2018–December 2023

I believe that filled with people is a definition of busy. I could be wrong, but if not, I'd like someone to add it. — This unsigned comment was added by Warr40 (talkcontribs) at 2010-01-15T23:11:23.

RFM discussion: July 2018–December 2023 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


The two verb senses are bad IMHO. The first should be at busy oneself, I think, since it is always reflexive AFAIK. The second one doesn't sound right at all -- "He busied her" isn't something I've heard. Is that real at all? 69.255.250.219 02:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Support the move of verb sense 1 to busy oneself. Send verb sense 2 to RFV. - excarnateSojourner (talk|contrib) 05:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's not purely reflexive, so I oppose the move for sense 1. Examples: "I will [] busy him with my affairs till he forgets his own" [1]; "And what has been busying you?" [2]; " [] he busied you with other chores" [3]. Rarer than I thought, since I've heard e.g. "sorry for busying you" in real life, but it's a thing. Sense 2 I'm unfamiliar with. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 23:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
[[busy oneself]] might be a good hard redirect to the appropriate sense of busy, which would benefit from {{lb|en|usually reflexive}} and corresponding usage examples. DCDuring (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
The sense at [[busy]] should remain, whether or not there is a separate lemma entry for busy oneself. DCDuring (talk) 14:48, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Redirecting busy oneself and a label makes sense, agreed. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 16:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


Return to "busy" page.