Talk:fagmosexual

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV in topic RFV discussion: May–July 2014

RFV discussion: May–July 2014 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


You would think the only hope for this one would be Usenet, but the cite already in this entry refers to the only Usenet post that contains this word (if Google Groups is to be believed). The other cite on the entry is not, as best I can tell, a durable citation.

There are only two Google Books hits, one of which doesn't appear to even contain this word. This, that and the other (talk) 11:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Failed. Citations moved to Citations:fagmosexual. — Ungoliant (falai) 00:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


Return to "fagmosexual" page.