Talk:funner

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Equinox in topic Funner listed as Adjective now

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Nonce/humor only. --Connel MacKenzie T C 19:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

It should be "more fun". SemperBlotto 21:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Considering the above entry (funnest) is accepted, shouldn't funner also be accepted? I can't stand either of them, but shouldn't we try to be consistent? Doremítzwr 00:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Not if this one is stupider. Davilla 09:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
To me, they seem equally stupid. In general, if an adjective has a particular superlative form (id est -er), does it not also have a corresponding comparative form (id est -est)? I find myself agreeing with Paul G in the above discussion concerning funnest
Doremítzwr 12:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Because I personally prefer "more stupid" to "stupider" and "stupidest" to "most stupid", it would be pretty easy for me to accept. ∂ανίΠα 23:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Added cites and a usage note with references. —Muke Tever 23:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

rfvpassed. Andrew massyn 17:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


Funner listed as Adjective now edit

It appears all Citations are broken. And checking both webster and dictionary.com both list funner as an adjective and part of the English language now.

Yes, to me it's a little informal but not really nonstandard. Equinox 17:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Return to "funner" page.