The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Second (redundant) sense. --Connel MacKenzie 16:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- They don't seem distinct to me, but it's the second that's more general. I would merge them. DAVilla 04:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think I would merge them as well. --EncycloPetey 15:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Although essentially the same, the possibly artificial distinction made here may be helpful to ESL readers. Examples added (which would each apply to a merged definition). 188.8.131.52 16:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- No reason to not keep the addition example sentences, but it is wrong to call them separate senses. Merging defs, keeping examples. --Connel MacKenzie 04:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)