Last modified on 20 September 2010, at 13:20
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive.
Second (redundant) sense. --Connel MacKenzie 16:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- They don't seem distinct to me, but it's the second that's more general. I would merge them. DAVilla 04:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think I would merge them as well. --EncycloPetey 15:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Although essentially the same, the possibly artificial distinction made here may be helpful to ESL readers. Examples added (which would each apply to a merged definition). 18.104.22.168 16:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- No reason to not keep the addition example sentences, but it is wrong to call them separate senses. Merging defs, keeping examples. --Connel MacKenzie 04:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)