Talk:moiety

Wikipedia Edit History

From the merged Transwiki: This page was m:Transwikied from Wikipedia. Below is the edit history for the Wikipedia article.

• Time: 2003-07-21T23:53:40Z - By: w:User:129.219.50.82
• Time: 2003-07-22T00:24:30Z - By: w:User:Ed Cormany - Comment: mostly fmt and stub boilerplate
• Time: 2003-11-07T05:17:22Z - By: w:User:Silsor - Comment: anthropological definition of moiety
• Time: 2003-11-07T05:17:57Z - By: w:User:Silsor - Comment: link fix
• Time: 2003-12-20T13:41:37Z - By: w:User:217.162.153.101 - Comment: de:
• Time: 2004-04-03T13:28:51Z - By: w:User:D3 - Comment: replacing text with {msg:stub}
• Time: 2004-05-05T21:41:56Z - By: w:User:129.2.209.103
• Time: 2004-05-05T21:45:53Z - By: w:User:129.2.209.103
• Time: 2004-05-05T21:46:44Z - By: w:User:129.2.209.103
• Time: 2004-05-05T21:47:30Z - By: w:User:129.2.209.103
• Time: 2004-11-15T18:46:14Z - By: w:User:66.3.229.194 - Comment: deleted sentence about "White and Arab worlds" --completely irrelevant to the term
• Time: 2004-12-18T00:13:20Z - By: w:User:Kdau - Comment: cleanup
• Time: 2005-03-03T04:50:35Z - By: w:User:Jag123 - Comment: rm stub
• Time: 2005-04-01T14:32:52Z - By: w:User:Megan1967 - Comment: link edit
• Time: 2005-06-01T22:56:30Z - By: w:User:2004-12-29T22:45Z
• Time: 2005-06-21T09:05:49Z - By: w:User:155.54.213.9
• Time: 2005-06-21T09:06:15Z - By: w:User:155.54.213.9
• Time: 2005-06-23T05:56:46Z - By: w:User:Dmcdevit - Comment: {{move to Wiktionary}}

Discussion

There is a sense of moeity used to describe the Australian aboriginal concept of "skins". Within a tribe there is (or was formerly) two to several moeities which determined who could marry whom and so forth. "Skin" seems to be the non-technical term used by aboriginies. This term is probably used by antrhopologists to cover similar systems of other traditional peoples. Perhaps somebody could check. — Hippietrail 17:11, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Moiety. I don't know enough about anthropology to add a decent definition here, though. --Quuxplusone 23:34, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

The first definition seems archaic, in fact in modern usage only the definitions relating to chemistry or other scientific jargon seem appropriate. 64.212.128.3 12:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)