Talk:randominity
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Ruakh in topic randominity
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Just an error, existence of entry is quite unhelpful and misleading. --Connel MacKenzie 03:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I found a citation, so I recreated this entry. However, I sent it immediately to RFV. † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 18:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Previously deleted, but finding a citation encouraged me to reädd it. Sent to RFV as I only saw one citation (not that I looked very far). † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 18:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Finished. DAVilla 18:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Since all but one of the quotations is from Usenet, do the quotations count as "durably archived"? The usual term in literature is randomness. --EncycloPetey 17:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
RFV passed. Thanks, DAVilla. —RuakhTALK 19:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)