RFV discussion: December 2020–January 2021 edit

 

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


This looks like a rare misspelling of revers, possibly by mistaken back-formation from the (unchanged) plural in combination with the silence of the final ⟨s⟩.  --Lambiam 13:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

cited Kiwima (talk) 02:54, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFV-passed. If you still consider it a misspelling, you could try RFD. Kiwima (talk) 06:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Return to "rever" page.