Talk:various

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Backinstadiums in topic Individual

Both determiner and adjective, I'd say.

===Determiner===
#A collection of some number of items, that usually represent samples of most sub-type

===Adjective===
#A collection of a [[variety]] of some thing, usually encompassing most possible [[variations]]

That look a little better Hippietrail? --Connel MacKenzie 16:38, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Well I'm no good at writing defs myself so far be it for me to nitpick. But since you've asked my opinion then I guess I should (:
Your determiner def seems very verbose and doesn't convey a clear meaning to me, overall it seems like a definition of a noun.
Your adjective definition is much better but I don't think the "most possible variations" bit is true.
Hippietrail 11:22, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Korean edit

I rolled back this edit as part of nuking zkg entries per RFD. If it was valid, redo it. - -sche (discuss) 08:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Determiner: various of the rules. edit

PRONOUN: (Informal) several, many, or numerous ones: I spoke with various of them. --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

The lake and various of its tributaries has a slightly different meaning from the lake and various tributaries of it; the former makes the scope of the larger set (the lake's tributaries) seem more definite, while the latter implies that its scope is indeterminate, unknown, or unimportant --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

With apostrophe: various' ? edit

The British Hansard lists six entries with an apostrophe.
Example: "[...] believed, on the authority of professional men, that the steam ships belonging to various' great companies, and employed in the conveyance of the mails over every ocean [...]"
Was this genuine usage (whether prescribed or proscribed), or is it merely a glitch in analysing the documents (i.e. no apostrophe in the originals)? The examples seem to convey to me the notion that the following noun/phrase was seen as belonging to the class known as "various". Or maybe an analysis like "companies of variety" → *"variety's companies" → *"various' companies"??
—DIV (49.195.177.247 01:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC))Reply

Follow up: I couldn't find it in other corpora. —DIV (49.195.177.247 09:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC))Reply

Individual edit

Individual or separate, as in The various arguments all have their strong and weak points. --Backinstadiums (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "various" page.