Talk:willie-wag
Latest comment: 11 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: November–December 2012
RFD discussion edit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
This would fail no doubt RFV. --Perriette (talk) 23:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Do not RFV. Delete and do not re-enter without at least one valid citation. Then we can talk about RFV. DAVilla 03:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This is supposed to have words with some rational degree of usage. Collect (talk) 14:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Move to Urban Dictionary. --WikiTiki89 14:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Moved to RFV, where it belongs if there is a doubt about attestation. I have never heard of "rational degree of usage", nor did google:"rational degree of usage". --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Appears unattested. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- As I noted elsewhere, there appears to be no actual usage with anything remotely near the meaning claimed. A "willie-wag-tail" is a kind of bird, and Robert Burns used the term in a poem, but I canna conceive of it having the meaning asserted here at all. And I looked assiduously for such a usage. Fail. Epic fail. Collect (talk) 02:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)