Template talk:RQ:Richardson Clarissa
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sgconlaw in topic Template:RQ:Richardson Clarissa
- Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.
This also needs some tag to accept normal numbers, like in wooer. Notusbutthem (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Notusbutthem:
Done but, seriously, it's not like you can't just follow the instructions and use Roman numerals. — SGconlaw (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.
Also, a letter= bit here would be useful, as Wonderfool has on numerous occasions included it although it does nothing ATM Zumbacool (talk) 17:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Zumbacool: Done. — Sgconlaw (talk) 17:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.
So, I was trying to be template-smart again (which is never a smart move) by linking to this website, but it obviously failed so I'm doing as always and asking you to fix it... Zumbacool (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Zumbacool: unnecessary change. We should try to use the first editions of works in quotation templates. Not seeing the merit of linking to a 1902 edition which doesn't clearly indicate the page numbers. — Sgconlaw (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)