Template talk:etyl:tmr
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Msh210
The following discussion has been moved from the page user talk:msh210.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Since the "Aramaic" (arc) entries created by 334a were moved to "Classical Syriac" (syc), apparently splitting Aramaic into being considered multiple languages, should this be restored? --Yair rand 20:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- And the rest are still listed as Aramaic? Heh.
- Truth is, I don't know. I don't know enough about Aramaic to know whether to count it as one language or many, and, if the latter, how finely. I was calling everything "Aramaic" because that's what 334a did; if he's switched, then he'd be the one to ask why and what he thinks the new rule should be. (That is, he might not be the one to ask; but I'm certainly not, as I was just following his lead.)—msh210℠ 21:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)