Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2008-02/User:TheDaveRoss

User:TheDaveRoss for checkuser edit

  • Vote ends: 21 March 2008 23:59 UTC w:WP:SNOW'ed on 00:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 20 February 2008 23:59 UTC

Support edit

  1.   Support Connel MacKenzie 03:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Duh. --Connel MacKenzie 03:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support Nadando 03:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support EncycloPetey 03:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support Atelaes 03:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support I don't know if I'm actually eligible to "vote" on Wiktionary, but the thoughtfulness and initiative Dave has exhibited gives me confidence enough to support him. Bastique 05:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, you are eligible to vote, as are all regular contributors here, as well as other WMF projects. We tried to set a "minimum 50 contributions" but that excluded too many of our neighbors (especially other language Wiktionaries that, like-it-or-not, are affected by votes here.) --Connel MacKenzie 05:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support - Based on Connel's statement of eligibility and Cary's reasoning. Would it have been better if Dave had confirmed sooner? yes. But stuff happens. Note: If the regulars here support, I'd hate to see this fail for lack of 25, so my support will help ensure that doesn't happen. If the regulars here oppose, my support will be washed away, so it will work out either way. ++Lar: t/c 11:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: Please note that his previous vote passed but he stepped down when the new restrictions were added (that he has graciously agreed to, now.) --Connel MacKenzie 21:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support as well, per Lar. (I'm not a regular contributor, but I have a couple of edits here, too. ;o) ) --Thogo (talk) 18:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Conrad.Irwin 18:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support DAVilla 19:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support I can't believe this wasn't done already. ArielGlenn 21:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support DCDuring TALK 22:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support Wytukaze 23:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support whilst not using cute templates or icons... - Amgine/talk 23:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support completely as I trust him. Apple1976 00:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (Note: This editor had no contributions at time of voting, though (s)he did remain active for a few days afterward, and contributed a few dozen edits in that time. Given the nature of this vote, that may or may not be an issue. —RuakhTALK 00:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]
  15.   SupportRuakhTALK 01:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support \Mike 10:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC) Sure.[reply]
  17.   Support Bequw¢τ 14:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support —Stephen 19:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Supportmsh210 22:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support GerardM 11:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support Jonathan Webley 10:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support — Beobach972 05:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support Williamsayers79 18:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support Neskaya talk 01:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support H. (talk) 19:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support. Cheers! bd2412 T 07:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

Abstain edit

Decision edit