Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin

Ruakh is a fine editor who is very active at RFV and does a lot of work with Hebrew articles. He's been here for several months now and has shown himself to be a reasonable person. I see no reason he shouldn't be given adminship. Dmcdevit·t 04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vote ends: 04:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Vote started by: Dmcdevit·t 04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Acceptance:

Support Dmcdevit·t 04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC). Dmcdevit·t 04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Atelaes 04:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC) I trust Ruakh with the buttons more than I trust myself. It's about time.[reply]
Support Robert Ullmann 12:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. bd2412 T 15:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Widsith 15:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support DAVilla 17:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tohru 21:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lmaltier 12:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Stephen 13:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Williamsayers79 13:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cynewulf 14:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beobach972 15:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC) (— Beobach972 15:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Support --Keene 17:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain Connel MacKenzie 21:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC) I dislike the tendency of treating Wiktionary as if it were Wikipedia, or the assumption that it is driven by Wikipedian concepts. I think a few months from now might be better.[reply]
If you could give me some specifics (whether here, or on my talk-page, or via e-mail), I'd appreciate it. I don't know what you're referring to, and whether or not I'm given adminship, I'd like to know if I'm treating Wiktionary like something it isn't. Thanks in advance. —Ruakh_TALK 22:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]