praeclarum theorema
Translingual
Etymology
So named by G.W. Leibniz in his unpublished papers of 1690 (later published as Leibniz: Logical Papers in 1966), meaning "splendid theorem" in Latin.
Noun
- (logic) The following theorem of propositional calculus: (A → B) ∧ (C → D) → (A ∧ C → B ∧ D). [1][2][3][4]
- What is now called the praeclarum theorema is actually "one half" of Leibniz's original theorem, which was like so: if A = B and C = D, then AC = BD, whose appearance is splendidly algebraic. (It can also be stated as (A ↔ B) ∧ (C ↔ D) → (A ∧ C ↔ B ∧ D).)
- The praeclarum theorema can be seen to correspond with the logical rule
of sequent calculus; given two sequents
and
one may infer (through the sequent calculus) that
, where the comma on the left side of the turnstile can be interpreted as a kind of conjunction. So perhaps the
rule, together with the
rule:
, and the disjunctive analogue
, can help to interpret the sequent calculus as being rather "algebraic" (esp. if the syntactic consequence (represented by the turnstile) is compared to a preorder).
See also
- constructive dilemma
References
- ^ http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/PraeclarumTheorema.html
- ^ http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Praeclarum_Theorema
- ^ http://mally.stanford.edu/cm/leibniz/ (Proposition 10)
- ^ Theorem prth698 at Metamath Proof Explorer
of sequent calculus; given two sequents
and
one may infer (through the sequent calculus) that
, where the comma on the left side of the turnstile can be interpreted as a kind of conjunction. So perhaps the
rule:
, and the disjunctive analogue
, can help to interpret the sequent calculus as being rather "algebraic" (esp. if the syntactic consequence (represented by the turnstile) is compared to a preorder).