Talk:厂

Graphical significance

Need etymology/graphical significance. 71.66.97.228 18:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Also traditional in Mandarin?

Can this character also be traditional in Mandarin? 71.66.97.228 19:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

There are two distinct words written ⼚: Radical 27 (Cliff), traditional and simplified; and the simplified version of 廠 (workshop). I am currently clarifying this with two separate etymologies/definitions. HanEditor (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

RFC discussion: March 2015

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

厂

Cleanup of at least Translingual, Chinese to the new Han character format, and Japanese —umbreon126 02:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

@Umbreon126 Not sure if radicals should be definitions. They probably belong to "Translingual". In modern Chinese, it's only a simplified form of 廠 or 厰. Otherwise, the cleanup is complete. @Wyang Any thoughts on this? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 23:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps "Kangxi radicals" could be treated as symbols? —umbreon126 18:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

As a component of other characters, '厂' can be referred to as '偏厰兒／偏厰儿' (piānchǎngr) and '厰字頭／厰字头' (chǎngzìtóu).

The simplified form should be 偏厂儿 --Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

@Geographyinitiative: That's because you used the wrong 廠. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 17:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

RFC discussion: May 2018

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

厂

Not sure if this belongs here, but I have trouble with the etymologies. Check the edit page of that page to see what I mean. It won't go the way I want it to. Johnny Shiz (talk) 20:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

@Johnny Shiz: It should be fixed. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 08:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)