Talk:父時間
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
None of these are valid by my ken. All created by known-suspect IP user Special:Contributions/90.209.77.109.
- 父時間 should be 時の翁 instead
- 父天空 should be 父なる空 instead
- 父土地 should be 祖国 instead
- 母自然 should be 大自然 instead
- 母地球 should be 母なる大地 instead
- 母土地 should be 母国 instead
Listed over on RFV for a while. Adding here based on that discussion. -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 14:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- RFV'd entries get at least 30 days (usually more, but only because there's a massive backlog, going back about four years!). The only time they don't get 30 days is if they're speedy deletion candidates. That's up to individual administrators to use their judgment. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Should I remove this section from the page for now?
- And just FYI, these six are all extremely bad pidgin Japanese. It's conceivable that they might exist in some manga somewhere, but even then they would have been deliberately coined as extremely bad pidgin Japanese. -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 16:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
None of these are valid by my ken. All created by IP user Special:Contributions/90.209.77.109.
- 父時間 should be 時の翁 instead
- 父天空 should be 父なる空 instead
- 父土地 should be 祖国 instead
- 母自然 should be 大自然 instead
- 母地球 should be 母なる大地 instead
- 母土地 should be 母国 instead
All contain links to JA WP, which this user loves to add to entries even when there is no such JA WP article -- as is the case for all six of these entries.
If no one can verify these, could we put them on the list for speedy deletion? -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 20:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I can't seem to find any google reference that uses any of these words in the way they are defined on wt. I have informed the author about this thread. Maybe we should wait to see what he/she can come up with? Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 21:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the cool head, James. :) By way of background, I have tried numerous times to contact this user, as have others, as noted on User_talk:90.209.77.109 and also over at Wiktionary:Requests_for_cleanup#90.209.77.109 and Wiktionary:Requests_for_cleanup#90.209.77.109_2. I feel a sense of frustrated anxiety, as this user, while apparently acting in good faith, seems very much the bull in the china shop. When I start seeing pidgin Japanese (as the above) echoed across the intarwebs by the various WT mirrors, some purporting a certain amount of authoritativeness, my sense of urgency increases.
- That said, that's my problem, and waiting a (short?) while for the user to pipe up is likely the best course of action. -- Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 22:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- That's the kid that creates entries from Anime and Manga, isn't it? Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 22:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- That said, that's my problem, and waiting a (short?) while for the user to pipe up is likely the best course of action. -- Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 22:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think so, one of the same IP users for Wiktionary:Requests_for_verification#霊漿 / 霊法 above. -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 22:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- The very same, and the same user who created 良気 which I added to this page too. I believe it is the same user at User_talk:90.209.77.78 who was blocked at that IP for a longer period, and Special:Contributions/2.221.151.186, which the user seems only to have access to occasionally. I generally avoid messing with entries related to magic or religion, but when they concern the real world I check them and usually find it necessary to edit or undo them. Haplology 04:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think the time to assume good faith has passed. Anything that gets zero relevant hits on Google Books/News/Scholar/Groups and also very few relevant Google hits in Japanese should get deleted. There is a danger of us having a few dozen made up words simultaneously. And the edit in question hasn't replied here, two days later. --Mglovesfun (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- The very same, and the same user who created 良気 which I added to this page too. I believe it is the same user at User_talk:90.209.77.78 who was blocked at that IP for a longer period, and Special:Contributions/2.221.151.186, which the user seems only to have access to occasionally. I generally avoid messing with entries related to magic or religion, but when they concern the real world I check them and usually find it necessary to edit or undo them. Haplology 04:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
No further comments added, and in agreement with Mglovesfun, I'm adding these to RFD. -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 14:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
PS - Since I've added these to RFD, should I strike them out here? -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 14:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)