Talk:頓河畔羅斯託夫

RFV discussion: September–November 2016

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

頓河畔羅斯託夫

Is this an incorrect simplified-to-traditional conversion, or is it attestable? — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 01:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Conversion error. My mistake but I don't remember what I used then. The basic term "羅斯託夫" (Rostov) would be easier to test. "罗斯托夫" is the correct traditional form. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 04:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

• RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 06:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)