Number edit

While you can say "the French" to refer to people from France, I don't think you can say "a French" to refer to a single French person. Anyone have a reference or example? -- Paul G 17:31, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I agree with you, my dictionary does not mention this definition. I have looked at the history of the article and it reveals it is User:Ensjo who have done this change. Perhaps he can explain why ? Koxinga 18:40, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I can. It's accurate for early Modern English. It's considered nonstandard now. Ditto Chineses. — LlywelynII 04:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Freeman? edit

"Le mot 'franc' signifie 'homme libre'." I read this sentence in "Easy French Reader" by R. de Roussy de Sales published by NTC, 1985. Does being French means being 'free'? — This unsigned comment was added by 68.13.253.13 (talk) at 10:08, 6 June 2004 (UTC).Reply

No. — LlywelynII 04:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Walloons= edit

Wallonia has its own version of French Walloon. GerardM 09:07, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

So? — LlywelynII 04:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hindi spelling edit

Hmm so which of these two are right? Are the virama and candrabindu optional in Devanagari or just Hindi's use of it? Here are how the two spellings work:

फानिसिस
pa aa na i ra i ra
फ़्राँसीसी
fa virama ra aa candrabindu sa ii sa ii

The 2nd one looks more correct to me based on the virama and "fa" rather than "pa". I can't guess on the "i" vs "ii". I don't know whether the dot under the "fa/pa" is optional either. — Hippietrail 02:51, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I (=128.104.220.225 = User:Lethe) think that Yann's version is correct, and the old version was not. Except for candrabindu, which i have fixed, according to the Hindi Talk page, q.v. — This unsigned comment was added by 128.104.220.225 (talk) at 16:24, 20 September 2004 (UTC).Reply
I am absolutely certain that फ़्राँसीसी is the right spelling. Beside the fact that I speak fluently hindi, I got this from the Dictionnaire Hindi-Français de Federica Boschetti, Editions du Mark. Yann 19:34, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I just wanted to mention Google hits for the various spellings. For our old spelling there are a few hits but all seem to be mirrors of the Wiktionary article. The spelling with candrabindu gets no hits. The spelling with just bindu gets 281 hits on real Hindi pages. — Hippietrail 00:59, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)

about "French" the adjective edit

I removed "Speaker of a language of French (for example French Canadian)" because that comes under "of or pertaining to the French language", and "speaker" is a noun anyway. — This unsigned comment was added by Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talkcontribs) at 22:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

 

This entry has passed Wiktionary's verification process without prejudice.

This means that, while adequate citation may not have been recorded, discussion has concluded that usage is widespread and content is accurate
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so. See Wiktionary’s criteria for inclusion


[[French language]] edit

Seems to be an invalid redirect, but WhatLinksHere shows it still in use? --Connel MacKenzie 17:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Romanian language redirects to Wiktionary:Romanian language, but even that just looks like a wikipedia article. I think there are some regular entries with the "X language" format, but I can't think of what they are off the top of my head. — [ ric ] opiaterein18:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
There are quite a few entries with the name "X language" that should not exist. I expect that the readon they do is that the various ISO user box templates invoke the category, so people have created them to make the links blue. A permanent fix would necessitate that the various userboxen are adjusted not to link to the language in this way. --EncycloPetey 00:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


RFV-failed sense: citation edit

This sense has just failed RFV after a year, but since there was one citation I reproduce it here:

  1. (informal) risqué, racy, bawdy.

— This unsigned comment was added by Equinox (talkcontribs) at 00:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC).Reply

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


French edit

"(informal) risqué, racy, bawdy." Not sure the given citation backs it up. Equinox 18:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be the same sort of thing as French letters, it sounds plausible although I don't know if I've ever heard it outside set phrases. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Failed RFV. Equinox 00:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


Is the noun "French" actually countable as stated? edit

No sense seems amenable to singular usage. Equinox 00:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

It was in early Modern English. — LlywelynII 04:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Return to "French" page.