Talk:Pizza Hut
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Doesn't belong in a dictionary. Belongs in an encyclopedia. 2602:306:3653:8920:B5CF:D32F:7F21:D1E4 01:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- I suppose it could meet WT:BRAND, in being casually and non-commercially mentioned without saying what it is, but it's pretty clearly a restaurant from the name (unlike McDonald's). I don't like this kind of entry. Equinox ◑ 13:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Still, send to RfV to determine whether it does, in fact, meet WT:BRAND. If the citations supporting this are not forthcoming, it will be deleted. bd2412 T 15:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
It needs citations that meet WT:BRAND. A RFD discussion what created for it today, but I believe this is rather a case for RFV.
McDonald's looks like a comparable case. See Talk:McDonald's for past RFV discussions. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 01:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)