Talk:Rückingen

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Rückingen

was created before the placename CFI was voted down; why do we need this small village in a /dictionary/? -- 84.177.198.99 02:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

• Our mission statement is to include "all words in all languages". Are you saying that the name of this village is not a word? SemperBlotto 08:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  • I wonder who that IP is. In any case I created the entry only to prove how ridiculous the placename CFI are, so I don't care all too much. -- Liliana • 12:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  • In that case, we'll just keep it. By the way, just because placenames are acceptable doesn't mean you have to create them if you don't want to. SemperBlotto 22:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Who is "we"? I'd like to have a more thorough discussion than just Semper and an IP. -- Liliana • 16:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
• keep. It's a word. Linguistic (etymologic) dictionaries for placenames do exist. The page is not ridiculous at all, and it's already useful (pronunciation). But the definition should be expanded a bit because we don't know the precise sense (where is this village, more precisely?), and the etymology too (if possible). Lmaltier 08:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
  • In some cases yes (like Hitlersee), and I liked the old placename CFI in this regard which set up hurdles for including place names. Too bad it was voted down. -- Liliana • 16:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

• Keep. Governed by WT:CFI#Names_of_specific_entities. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Kept. — Ungoliant ^(Falai) 16:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)