RFV discussion: September 2016–March 2017 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Protologism ? No book results Leasnam (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

A lot of this user's entries need attention. Many have almost no Google hits; others are cited only from non-durable blogs. Equinox 22:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Some of these will probably need speedying. Ambicide makes no sense as an alternative form of amicide because ambo and amicus are entirely unrelated. Ambicide just looks like a typo that's been propagated. Google actually shows it as Ambicide, a sterilizing product. Some of these don't like speediable but might turn out not to exist nonetheless. Have we tried explaining CFI to this person? Renard Migrant (talk) 23:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've not come across anything speediable yet; monstricide looks good and chromonym seems to definitely mean something. Renard Migrant (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've tagged two for speedy, if you disagree, please list them here. Gynonym gets enough hits that it really has to mean something. And I'm done for the day right now. Renard Migrant (talk) 00:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 04:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Return to "actionedy" page.