Talk:bạch đôi
@PhanAnh123, Fumiko Take May I request your attention to this Tbot entry? Is it a valid term? Please remove the Tbot template if so. Wyang (talk) 15:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Where is this from? I could only find it on Wiktionary and glosbe.com, which is hopefully now regarded as a crappy dictionary. ばかFumiko￥talk 13:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Fumiko Take: We customarily delete entries created by bots out of due process if they are found to be in error. Do you have any reason to believe that cites may be found for this? If not, we should just delete it. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- I've just never heard of this. Not that I know everything there is to know about Vietnamese, but I haven't found anything that justifies its existence either. If this was created by a bot and currently no one can prove its merit, let's just delete it for now. ばかFumiko￥talk 04:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Accordingly speedied. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- I've just never heard of this. Not that I know everything there is to know about Vietnamese, but I haven't found anything that justifies its existence either. If this was created by a bot and currently no one can prove its merit, let's just delete it for now. ばかFumiko￥talk 04:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)