Talk:beaver buster
RFD edit
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The cites given, and others on Google Books, aren't enough IMHO --Simplus2 21:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedily move to RFV (bad nomination). Mglovesfun (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep this is a really common term and the nominator's rationale is a verification one not a CFI one so move to RFVLucifer 22:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Moved to WT:RFV#beaver buster -- please continue the discussion there. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Moving from RFD per discussion at WT:RFD#beaver buster. Copy of that discussion below. -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
|
The cites given, and others on Google Books, aren't enough IMHO --Simplus2 21:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
|
- Luciferwildcat has had two citations... neither of which are any good. One specific says that it's a pseudonym for a person, one doesn't use it in a sentence but just on its own, so one conveys a different meaning to the one in the entry, one conveys no meaning. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 20:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)