Talk:bustle with
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: October–November 2017
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Not a unit, is it, really? It's like a voice "swelling with" emotion or a finger "throbbing with" pain. Equinox ◑ 19:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a convincing phrasal/prepositional verb. Mihia (talk) 14:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. A usage note in bustle is enough. --Barytonesis (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The one OneLook reference with it has only a hard redirect to bustle, which has bustle with in a usage example. We already have such a usage example at [[bustle]]. We might add a context label
{{lb|en|usually|with with}}DCDuring (talk) 14:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- RFD failed. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)