Talk:cz
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vininn126 in topic RFD discussion: June 2023–March 2024
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Polish. In some languages such as Hungarian digraphs are considered letters, but in Polish they are not.
- @Kwamikagami as the creator. Vininn126 (talk) 11:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, we should call them digraphs. As soon as the template supports that option, they should be corrected. But that's not reason for deletion. (I started a tech request on how to deal with this, but there haven't been any responses.)
- Before I discovered the template, I'd write "A digraph in X orthography", but for consistency the template should be used. kwami (talk) 11:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami If someone creates a separate template for digraphs, then I'll support their addition (together with "dzi" which is considered a trigraph by some authors; also, e.g. PWN counts them as separate lemmas and provides definitions for them), but for now let's delete them. Shumkichi (talk) 12:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be a separate template, just add 'digraph' as a keyword like 'letter'. kwami (talk) 12:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- if we just change the name of the header, the entries will still be categorised as letters. Shumkichi (talk) 12:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- I changed to 'symbol', and the cats changed as well. kwami (talk) 19:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- 'Digraph' now generates categories appropriately. kwami (talk) 04:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- if we just change the name of the header, the entries will still be categorised as letters. Shumkichi (talk) 12:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be a separate template, just add 'digraph' as a keyword like 'letter'. kwami (talk) 12:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Kwamikagami If someone creates a separate template for digraphs, then I'll support their addition (together with "dzi" which is considered a trigraph by some authors; also, e.g. PWN counts them as separate lemmas and provides definitions for them), but for now let's delete them. Shumkichi (talk) 12:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. We have no tradition of having entries for digraphs. Even for English, we have no entries for such common digraphs as ch, gh, ph, sh and th. —Mahāgaja · talk 12:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, though for English (and Irish), 'digraph' is a fuzzy category, and not all cases are as clear-cut as ph. (ti, for example.) Things are clearer in most other languages that have them. kwami (talk) 04:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
RFD-deleted. Vininn126 (talk) 09:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)