Talk:dot matrix

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Smuconlaw in topic RFC discussion: March 2014–February 2017

RFC discussion: March 2014–February 2017 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Idiomatic? Adjective or attributive use of noun(s?)? — Ungoliant (falai) 00:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

See dot matrix printer. We have so many SOP entries, it's almost refreshing to have a "missing parts" entry for a change. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
According to Oxford (hard copy and online) it's a noun that is normally used as a modifier. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/dot-matrix?q=dot+matrix Donnanz (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • It does have a plural actually; either "dot matrices" or "dot matrixes", so I think this entry should be altered to a noun. I have added a link to the Wikipedia article. Donnanz (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've added the noun entry. Is adjectival usage merely attributive usage of the noun? Dbfirs 08:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Someone could prove me wrong, but as I see it predicate use is the best chance for showing this to behave as a true adjective:
 *"That is the most dot matrix printer I've ever seen."; *"That printer is more dot matrix than this one."
 *"It is a very dot matrix printer."
 ?"That printer is dot matrix."
I don't think that the modest amount of predicate use we are likely to find warrants an adjective entry, but rules is rules. DCDuring TALK 11:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Done: seems like an attributive use to me. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


Return to "dot matrix" page.