Talk:lushu hoo megwa fugi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Prisencolin in topic RFV discussion: June 2017

RFV discussion: June 2017 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Was told by @Justinrleung that this shouldn't be added as a Chinese entry so I created it as an English phrase, seeing as it is most commonly attesting in English-language sources. Another editor listed it in WT:RFD and @Atitarev deleted it shortly afterwards. The exact phrase with consistently spelling appears in numerous print accounts of the Doolittle Raid, as well as the major Hollywood movie Pearl Harbor.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

RFD discussion: June 2017 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Supposedly English. I think not. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be speedied by Atitarev. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 21:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


RFC discussion: June 2017 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


— justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 05:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Deleted. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 21:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


Return to "lushu hoo megwa fugi" page.