http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/non%20sequitur <-- according to a lot of definitions, non sequitur also refers to a statement that does follow what precedes it. I'm not seeing that definition in this wiktionary definition so for that reason I'd like to add it. 22.214.171.124 17:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see that particular definition on that page. Are you sure you're not misreading? —Leftmostcat 17:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Well doesn't it say a statement that doesn't follow what preceded it in definition 2 on that page? It makes me think that this word also applies to a reply that is off the subject. I mean, I'm seeing the use of 'irrelevant response' in many of these official dictionaries as well http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?lextype=3&search=non_sequitur 126.96.36.199 17:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- English has no "official" dictionaries. Only languages whose usage is governed by an officially appointed body (such as French and Spanish) has "official dictionaries". I do tend to agree with the definition you added, however. --EncycloPetey 18:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Interesting note EncycloPetey. I did not know that. Anyways, thank you all for your input. User DC made a couple of finishing touches on my edit so I think all is taken care of now. :) 188.8.131.52 23:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Request for verificationEdit
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
- No, that's wrong. SemperBlotto 11:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)