Talk:pissaliere

RFV discussion: December 2016–April 2017

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

pissaliere

This entry was added a week ago, but it seems it was invented, with no real documentation. Can it be checked? [ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo] _{(parla con me)} 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I can only find this. Kiwima (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Definitely a poor result, maybe even overlooked. I can't find anything, except pissaladière. [ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo] _{(parla con me)} 20:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, the only Google hit for pissaliere is this “Monk's pissaliere” that is mirrored in various websites. I suggest the entry be deleted. [ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo] _{(parla con me)} 11:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Seems most likely an error for pissaladière. If so, delete unless it's a common error (which it doesn't appear to be, given the lack of Ghits). — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

• RFV failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 04:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)