Template talk:sockpuppet

Latest comment: 3 years ago by PseudoSkull in topic RFD discussion: June–August 2020

RFDO discussion: August 2014–June 2015 edit

 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Seemingly unused. Looks like stuff taken from Wikipedia. --Type56op9 (talk) 10:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:sockpuppeteer edit

As Template:sockpuppet --Type56op9 (talk) 10:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply


RFD discussion: June–August 2020 edit

 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Template:sockpuppeteer edit

Annoying, hideous, bureaucratic cruft that was migrated from Wikipedia at some point. Template:sockpuppet has only been used one single time legitimately, and the other two times it was used by apparently experienced vandals to label themselves with (which is kind of a harmful precedent for this template to set). And those are the only ever uses of that template. Template:sockpuppeteer has straight-up never been used. We have Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress for this sort of thing, which does just fine on its own. PseudoSkull (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

delete. Sockpuppets aren't an issue on Wiktionary. I wonder what @PUC has to say about it. --Nueva normalidad (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
I don't care. PUC20:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Delete. Seems pretty useless. Ultimateria (talk) 01:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Both deleted; a consensus to have these removed is definitely apparent. PseudoSkull (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


Return to "sockpuppet" page.