Template talk:sockpuppet
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Seemingly unused. Looks like stuff taken from Wikipedia. --Type56op9 (talk) 10:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I don't think sockpuppets are a problem over here. --Type56op9 (talk) 10:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Of course you're a problem over here; it's just that no one can be bothered puttnig this template on all of your userpages. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 13:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Kept. The nominater was probably high at the time of RFDing --Type56op9 (talk) 23:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Template:sockpuppeteer
edit
As Template:sockpuppet --Type56op9 (talk) 10:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep both: There have been sockpuppets in Wiktionary's history, so there are potential uses for this template. Purplebackpack89 13:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Prime example above (just to be clear, not you PBP). --WikiTiki89 14:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Kept. The nominater was probably high at the time of RFDing --Type56op9 (talk) 23:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oh wait, it was me. Hmm, I thought I'd changed account since August 2014. Sorry guys for the confusion. --Type56op9 (talk) 23:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- You're sorry for nothing, Type. Please strike these discussions in the future. --IdotIdotI (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Template:sockpuppeteer
edit
Annoying, hideous, bureaucratic cruft that was migrated from Wikipedia at some point. Template:sockpuppet has only been used one single time legitimately, and the other two times it was used by apparently experienced vandals to label themselves with (which is kind of a harmful precedent for this template to set). And those are the only ever uses of that template. Template:sockpuppeteer has straight-up never been used. We have Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress for this sort of thing, which does just fine on its own. PseudoSkull (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- delete. Sockpuppets aren't an issue on Wiktionary. I wonder what @PUC has to say about it. --Nueva normalidad (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don't care. PUC – 20:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems pretty useless. Ultimateria (talk) 01:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Both deleted; a consensus to have these removed is definitely apparent. PseudoSkull (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)