[[Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/kh₂eyd-|*kh₂eyd-]]

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua

I guess this would be material for BP or ID.

CodeCat19:40, 29 July 2015

Yes, yes, yes

JohnC519:44, 29 July 2015
 

Wait, what is "ID?" "Information Desk?"

JohnC501:07, 30 July 2015

Yes. I was using the WT: shortcut name. WT:ID.

CodeCat01:17, 30 July 2015

I thought ID was just for noobies. I've never actually read any discussions there.... Which would you suggest as the optimal location for this question?

JohnC502:04, 30 July 2015

I guess BP has more active people.

CodeCat12:58, 30 July 2015
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 21:40, 1 March 2023

Howdy, Code. Sorry about the Celtic stuff at *steh₂-. I am perfectly aware that Italo-Celtic is not completely accepted, and I've only used it twice in the past (here and in *bʰudʰmḗn) where the evidence for the proposal seems most convincing. As for the Goidelic/Brythonic business, I wish that had been told to me earlier. I've been using that schema for a little while now because I find it clear; though I take your point about OI being the only Goidelic language. And with Brythonic, I was just using Wikipedia's standard, which created the error. Oops.

JohnC516:38, 9 August 2015