Edit on seillean has been reverted

Hi. Can you please explain why you reverted my edit on seillean?

We're trying to eliminate the l/ templates.

Ahh, OK. That makes sense. Thank you.

BTW - I found documentation for the l/ templates at Template:link/documentation. Had I not seen it there, I would not have known of it.

Who is "we". Only a few weeks ago I was advised to favor l-template by a prominent user, I don't remember whom.

l/la and l/de are being discussed at WT:RFDO right now. In those discussions, some people seem to be treating them like obvious junk, but to be fair it has been brought up that when these templates were created they would serve as a non-expensive alternative to l|la and l|de in huge pages like water. If they serve any other purpose is beyond me.