You actually nominated the entire entry for speedy deletion. What you should do, if anything, is use {{rfv-sense}}.

Mglovesfun (talk)23:14, 14 February 2011

BTW it would be easier for me, and I would say for others too if you reply here to comments left here. Otherwise the initial question is one place, and the reply somewhere else. Also, when defining words please use more 'formal' English and use a spellechecker such as the one Microsoft Word provides. I'd expect a 'good' dictionary to be free from spelling mistakes and 'rambling' definitions that are difficult to understand.

Mglovesfun (talk)00:07, 16 February 2011

"when defining words please use more 'formal' English and use a spellechecker "

I have no idea what you're talking about. Where are you suggesting that my English is not formal enough? I thought actually, way too formal. I think you are joking.

Geof Bard04:32, 16 February 2011

You sort of 'waffle' on as if to you were giving your personal opinion on the word, instead of 'meanings'.

Mglovesfun (talk)22:09, 16 February 2011

You need to link to specific examples. In many cases, I provide a nuanced explanation rather than a blunt, incorrect definition. But this conversation is meaningless in the abstract. Please provide link to the specific entries you are worried about. Thanks. Geof Bard 23:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Geof Bard23:40, 16 February 2011