*maiwaz "gull"

*maiwaz "gull"

Wnat seems to be the problem, officer?

We cannot refer to a completely nebulous substrate theory and at the same time expect any alternative to derive completely regularly. So I'm sure that whatever formal problem you might see with relating avis to Lua error in Module:parameters at line 92: Parameter 1 should be a valid language or etymology language code; the value "gmc-pro" is not valid. See WT:LOL and WT:LOL/E., it's no grounds for you to deny inclusion. Having just about any IE comparison, the more the merrier, to balance the view would be prefered.

On the talk page you wondered long ago about the i-stem reflex in Old English. Any updates on this? Oh, look at that: *Hew=i-s.

109.41.1.17521:35, 6 July 2020