This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

90.240.151.145 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I should not have been blocked. I only added a definition to the page keel. Why is that 'gibberish'? EDIT: I also noticed that the block notice uses a 'click here' link. This is bad practice and should be changed.
I shall repeat my comments from my user talk page here: "Wiktionary is not a place for made-up words (unless you put them in WT:LOP and nowhere else)." — surjection??09:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
It is not made-up, please see kag.net for source. 90.240.151.145 10:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
If it isn't made up, please provide three WT:CFI compliant uses (not mentions) that are in durably archived sources (e.g. books or Usenet) spanning over a year. — surjection??10:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
→ISBN, →ISBN, →ISBN. 90.240.151.145 14:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Those are not independent cites and thus not WT:CFI compliant. — surjection??22:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply



This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.

RIR WHOIS lookup: America Europe Africa Asia-Pacific Latin America/Caribbean