Mustliza

Header for ᨣᨧ᩠ᨨᨲᩥ

The masculine and neuter locative singular of ᨣᨧ᩠ᨨᨲᩥ (gacchati) is a *form* of the adjective, not a lemma for an adjective. Therefore it is to be described in the header word as {{head|pi|adjective form}}, not as {{head|pi|adjective form}}. I seem to have got it right first time in the header for gacchati. I don't know what happened to the "ective form" - we use {{pi-adj}} rather than {{head|pi|adjective}}.

I didn't add the Tai Tham form of the participle as I haven't yet seen it - though I am now leaning to the view that the declension of the present active participle should be recorded as automatically as the present stem conjugation. --RichardW57 (talk) 13:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

We don't use ===Adjective form=== as a header --Mustliza (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

True but irrelevant. We do use it as a parameter in headword lines. For example, choosing the Latin adjective form optimorum as a specimen, I find that its headword line ultimately invokes {{head|la|adjective forms|...}}. The final 's' in the parameter is optional. --RichardW57 (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

OK, thanks! --Mustliza (talk) 18:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

"invented" terms

Please note that neologisms and nonstandard terms are included in Wiktionary if they are attested (see: WT:Attestation). Thus, entries like micromedición, which appear to be in use per Google Books and other durable sources, do merit an entry in Wiktionary. Same goes for subejecución etc. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 15:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks. You're my new favourite user! --Mustliza (talk) 18:39, 11 December 2018 (UTC)