Myersdtm

Thanks for adding quotations. Here's some general info, in case you are new.

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Equinox ◑ 03:38, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

wisp

You need to be very careful about using passages from advanced literary works as the basis for definitions. There are usually several layers of meaning involved, with some license taken in order to have the secondary connotations of different words play off of each other in complex ways. They also tend to omit supporting words to avoid diluting the impact of the important words. Such passages start from ordinary usage, but aren't reliabily examples of it. Whether either of us is right about this passage- or neither- you need to have other usage to bsck it up, because a single ambiguous use in a single work isn't enough evidence to create a definition with. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

And here is another opinion from someone more knowledgable about Faulkner's writing. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

I see you changed the definition. The new definition fits this single passage, but my version has support in Google Books, too, in passages describing ghosts or mists. It may be possible to merge them, or to add another sense. By the way: in the Faulkner passage, the gun is a phallic symbol, and "wisping thinly" is used to set up an image of weakness and impotence to play against the overt sexual violence about to take place. Like I said, this kind of passage is too ambiguous and complex to base an entire sense on by itself. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

underlife

You need to be much more careful in your editing. Please look at the changes I have made to this page in detail. Important points are that pages should be lowercase unless they always begin with an uppercase letter (like Rome), and factual matters must always be exact; giving the wrong year for when a book is written (and an incomplete title) is very sloppy. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 02:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quotations

Please use #*: for the second line of quotations, or put them on one line with {{quote-book}}. DTLHS (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 21:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)