Open main menu

Wiktionary β

User talk:TheDaveRoss

EWDCEdit

Hi! Here are your 10 random missing English words for this month. Let me know if you'd prefer a secret alert by e-mail next time.

Equinox 00:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

AdminshipEdit

Hello. Sorry if that feels a bit pushy, but would you be willing to nominate me for adminship? As I've said here, I'd like to take up the mop. I wouldn't feel comfortable with a self-nomination, however. --Barytonesis (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Confirmation of CheckUser statusEdit

Hello TheDaveRoss, as Chuck Entz has been successfully nominated as a CheckUser, can you confirm your wish to continue your task of CheckUser too (to be sure you want your CU rights restored). Best regards, Linedwell (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

@Linedwell I do, and I have been talking with RadiX about getting all of the ducks in a row. - TheDaveRoss 12:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

EWDC #2Edit

Hi! Here are your 10 random missing English words for this month.

Equinox 19:39, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

EWDC #3Edit

Hi! Here are your 10 random missing English words for this month.

Equinox 04:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

DatabaseEdit

Hello sir. I remember you saying somewhere that a Wiki is poorly suited to a dictionary project, but that, unless we want to throw away everything we've done and start from scratch, the conversion to a proper database would have to be incremental. Could you expand?

Sincerely,

--2A02:2788:A4:F44:A99F:AFD6:2D3D:98C4 17:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

I can expand on any of those points. I think a wiki is poorly suited for a dictionary because it has a very "flat" file format, and linguistic data is largely relational. The wiki format lends itself best to long-form information, such as Wikipedia. Having a reasonably strong relational database available would make many types of linguistic data much easier to store, process and present.
The start from scratch comment mostly concerns the current data structure, both locally and across all Wiktionary projects. Some data is in reasonably standard format, and could be processed into relational data easily. The vast majority of existing data is not and would need some form of human oversight to be accurately mapped into a database. This could be done incrementally, starting with virtually any type of relationship and moving through one at a time. I would imagine that it would be easiest to start with definitions and go from there.
Not sure that that was expansive enough, but if you would like specifics feel free to ask. - TheDaveRoss 13:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Template editorEdit

This anon has been engaged in a large number of template edits. I am rather template-oblivious so have no clue if these are positive edits, or ones which are breaking dozens/hundreds of entries. - Amgine/ t·e 16:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

@Amgine, Stardsen, Echtio The edits seem reasonable, assuming that the information is correct. Without any knowledge of Picard I am unable to say. Pinging some Picard editors, but anyone who knows French would be starting from a better place than I am. - TheDaveRoss 13:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
I can understand "picard" quite well. The edits seem OK. Good work. --Echtio (talk) 00:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC) See for example https://www.google.fr/search?ei=j0BMWvn_DIu6UdWkoLgB&q=%22avo%C3%A8tes%22&oq=%22avo%C3%A8tes%22&gs_l=psy-ab.12..0i13k1l10.46178.46178.0.48014.1.1.0.0.0.0.60.60.1.1.0....0...1c.2.64.psy-ab..0.1.59....0.uGY8yVp1tec --Echtio (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look, Echtio. - TheDaveRoss 13:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

DaveBot NORMs run 10/07Edit

Did you use /\-{4}\n/ to capture the hr? cuz…, just sayin'. - Amgine/ t·e 01:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Something like that, but I have since updated it to a more robust regex. - TheDaveRoss 13:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

VotatorEdit

Hi TheDaveRoss, can you please check the Votator definition on other online dictionaries? Other online dictionaries have the definition as I amended prior to you reverting it back. Please advise. Skim1024 (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@Skim1024 Onelook doesn't have any other dictionaries listed. Per the various discussions around this term we have concluded that the term has been genericized, so the trademark aspect belongs in the etymology not the definition. - TheDaveRoss 15:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Per online dictionaries http://www.definitions.net/definition/votator and http://www.yourdictionary.com/votator and https://www.wordnik.com/words/votator (tagged as a trademark) the definition of Votator is listed as a trademark/brand. I understand that per various discussions it was concluded as a term that was genericized, however, there are other online dictionary outlets that are showing it in the correct form. The word Votator has trademark registration certificates all around the world. Please reconsider. Skim1024 (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@Skim1024 Those sites are just presenting Wiktionary definitions, and have not pulled a more recent version. - TheDaveRoss 18:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

We should be able to at least mention the truth of the matter that the word VOTATOR is a registered trademark in the US and various other countries regardless of whether you believe it is a generic term. Please amend the definition as follows - a registered trademark for a brand of machine that cools and kneads liquid margarine etc., preparatory to packaging. This is not a misleading or false statement. If you require registration certificates, I am happy to supply them. If the definition of a word such as Xerox is labeled as a trademark (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/xerox), the definition of Votator should follow the same form. Skim1024 (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

xerox. - TheDaveRoss 21:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

EWDC #4Edit

Hi! Here are your 10 random missing English words for this month.

Equinox 23:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I would like to lodge a complaint, SemperBlotto added some of my words. These retirees are taking jobs away from we deserving <whatever my generation is called>. - TheDaveRoss 16:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
SemperBlotto is a bad man and I know where he lives. Arses may be kicked. Equinox 19:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

EWDC #5Edit

Hi! Here are your 10 random missing English words for this month.

Equinox 00:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

EWDC #6Edit

Hi! Here are your 10 random missing English words for this month.

Equinox 21:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous and Open ProxiesEdit

Gfarnab uses a lot of anonymous proxies, so I need to be clear on how we deal with these. I know open proxies aren't allowed, since there's no way anyone can ever know who's using them. Are anonymous proxies treated the same, or do we treat them like normal IPs because of their use to evade state internet censorship? Chuck Entz (talk) 20:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

@Chuck Entz. Personally I have mostly been deferring to the global blockers to place long-term blocks on proxies when applicable, and treating every block here as if it were a non-proxy. If I happen upon an IP that seems to have a pattern of abuse much longer than a typical block I will mention it to the global blockers. I don't think that policy is really established here, so you can feel free to place longer blocks on proxies as you see fit. I think Tor exit nodes and other proxies likely to be used for good purposes should have logged-in users exempted, but again I don't think that is a policy. - TheDaveRoss 11:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
So you were wrong whilst writing I was going to eventually get tired... It'd be better for your policing "grand scheme" not to lose at every new thing you try and to know that infinite proxies minus one proxy equals infinite proxies. Have fun pushing buttons unfruitfully!
I am not sure what I was wrong about, but I would contend that your activity here is the definition of unfruitful. I feel just fine about the results of my efforts. - TheDaveRoss 12:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Hmm, I was referring to Chuck: you, Dave, never wrote I was "going to eventually get tired" and I think the work you do here is fruitful. G'night!

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "TheDaveRoss".